The sources provided offer valuable insights into managing risks associated with AI, particularly focusing on Large Language Models (LLMs) and Generative AI. These sources include guidelines from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP), highlighting the growing importance of robust security measures in this rapidly evolving technological landscape.

NIST’s AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF)

• NIST’s AI RMF is a crucial resource for organizations developing or deploying AI systems.
• It provides a structured approach to managing risks, promoting the development of trustworthy and reliable AI.
• NIST AI 600-1, the Generative AI Profile, offers specific guidance on mitigating risks associated with generative AI, complementing the broader AI RMF.
• The Open Loop program, a collaboration between Meta and Accenture, analyzed the practical application of the AI RMF and the Generative AI Profile, providing feedback to NIST.
• A key finding of the Open Loop program was the need for greater clarity on the roles and responsibilities of different actors in the AI value chain.
• The sources suggest that NIST should further refine its taxonomy of AI actors to better reflect the complex dynamics of the AI ecosystem.

OWASP’s Focus on LLM Security

• OWASP offers several guides focused on securing LLMs and GenAI applications:
  • OWASP AI Security and Privacy Guide: A comprehensive resource for developers, security researchers, and consultants, addressing vital security and privacy considerations for AI systems.
  • OWASP Machine Learning Security Top 10: A community-driven project highlighting crucial security issues in machine learning systems, designed to be easily understandable for both security professionals and data scientists.
  • OWASP Top 10 for LLMs – LLM AI Security Center of Excellence (CoE) Guide: A guide for security teams and leadership to establish a Center of Excellence for AI security, emphasizing collaboration and best practices.
  • OWASP Top 10 for LLMs – Guide for Preparing and Responding to Deepfake Events: Provides practical guidance for cybersecurity professionals on handling deepfake incidents, encompassing risk assessment, incident response planning, and employee training.
  • OWASP LLM & GenAI Security Solutions Reference Guide: Offers a reference of solutions for securing the LLM and generative AI lifecycle, supporting the OWASP Top 10 for LLMs and the CISO Cybersecurity and Governance Checklist.
• These guides address various aspects of LLM security, including:
  • Vulnerability and Mitigation Taxonomy.
  • AI Incident Database: A crowdsourced repository documenting AI failures in real-world applications.
  • OECD AI Incidents Monitor (AIM): Provides a starting point for understanding AI-related challenges.
• **OWASP recognizes the importance of: **
  • Collaboration between different stakeholders, such as developers, security professionals, data scientists, and CISOs, to ensure LLM security.
  • Developing a shared understanding of solution categories that address security throughout the LLM lifecycle.

Key Concepts and Recommendations

• Understanding the AI Value Chain: Both NIST and OWASP emphasize the need to clearly define the roles and responsibilities of all actors involved in the AI development and deployment process.
• Comprehensive Risk Assessment: Identifying potential risks associated with LLMs and GenAI is critical. These risks can range from data poisoning and adversarial attacks to the generation of harmful or biased content.
• Developing Robust Security Solutions: OWASP provides resources and solution categories to address LLM security throughout the lifecycle, including tools for threat modeling, vulnerability scanning, and incident response.
• Collaboration and Information Sharing: Encouraging collaboration between organizations, researchers, and industry groups is essential for developing effective security measures and sharing best practices.
• Emphasis on Practical Guidance: The sources prioritize providing actionable advice and resources that can be readily implemented by organizations. This includes developing templates for information sharing, conducting tabletop exercises, and providing specific mitigation strategies.

By understanding and implementing the guidelines and recommendations presented in these sources, organizations can take proactive steps towards mitigating the risks associated with LLMs and generative AI, fostering a more secure and trustworthy AI ecosystem.

Resources: